Instill fear in the populace.
First, in the post Nixon era, the dwindling support
for conservatives was addressed by changing the conservative message
to cater to a specific market segment: fundamentalist/evangelical
Christians. This was a brilliant stroke. The "fundevs" as a group
are individuals that seek the "black and white" answer to the
exclusion of "gray areas". In other words, a polarized world view
without the burden of "questioning" these views.
To cater to this group, the neocons only had to
co-opt a few key issues, such as gay marriage or abortion. (It's
interesting to note that Bush Sr. was pro-choice, but adopted the
anti-abortion issue for these political reasons). The fundev
contingent makes an excellent partner for the neocons because of
their willingness to accept the "black and white spin" of the neocon
propaganda machine without question.
Second, the neocons have developed a very close
relationship with the mass media. While Fox News is the blatantly
obvious example of neocon owned propaganda, there are subtler
examples as well. Beginning with the Reagan administration, there
has been a systematic undermining of equal access broadcast law. In
1987 the fairness doctrine
was repealed.
The fairness doctrine required broadcasters to use
some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public
interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. This
was a fair exchange for use of the public airwaves. Public
broadcasters were using the airwaves, owned by the public, as
trustees.
But no more.
Another important change is that of ownership
limitation. Once upon a time, there were limits on how many stations
any single entity could own. For instance, the same corporation
could own no more than one AM, one FM and one TV station in any
single market, and no more than 8 of each, nationwide. Now, you can
own every broadcast station in a specific market - and
indeed, in some cities every single AM, FM and TV station is owned
by a single corporation. No competition, and no room for competing
views, either.
No where is this more apparent than in the enormous
nationwide conglomerates like Clear Channel and
Sinclair Broadcasting.
These enormous neocon broadcasters own so much of what Americans see
and hear, there's hardly room for a single opposing view.
Third, the instillation of fear across the nation
has had a galvanizing effect for the neocons. While parallels to the
Reichstag Fire in 1933
can easily be made with our 9/11 tragedy, what's more important is
to see how the neocon movement has used 9/11 to instill fear in the
American public.
Magicians use a technique called "misdirection" to
lead your attention away from the object of the "trick" so that when
they spring the result on you, you're baffled. And right now, fear
is being used as misdirection - misdirecting the attention of the
American public as the neocons make sweeping changes to America's
political and social landscape.
And it must be stopped. Right now Senator Ted
Stevens and his committee on Commerce are considering a censorious
House-passed "indecency" bill regulating radio and TV broadcasters--the Senator wants to
extend its provisions, not just to cable TV, but to the internet.
It is censorship, no matter how you slice it. And
it's repugnant - but it is just part of the neocon plans for the
destruction of America.
The reality is that Americans are no more likely
today to be the victim of a terrorist attack than they were before
9/11 - but Americans are already the victims of neocon policies.
Policies that should strike terror in the hearts of any free
thinking American.